Lahore experienced violent clashes while Islamabad transformed into a heavily guarded area. The current tension in Pakistan is linked to Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP), a far-right Islamist group. Interestingly, Labbaik is perceived as a tool of the Pakistani military establishment, utilizing street power to exert pressure on civilian governments and push for a theocratic state governed by Sharia law. The Labbaik has a history of holding Pakistan hostage through protest marches and displays of force.
Recently, a large number of Labbaik supporters attempted to march towards the US Embassy in Islamabad to protest the Gaza killings. This occurred as the world celebrated the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas following a two-year conflict. Streets were blocked with containers, barricades were set up, and internet services were suspended. These events unfolded after TLP clashed with security forces in Lahore, leading to casualties.
The rise of TLP, known for paralyzing cities, challenging civilian authorities, and exploiting religious sentiments, has raised concerns among observers and analysts. It is evident that the military’s support of TLP’s disruptive activities hints at a strategic move to empower extremist groups for political influence, particularly against civilian administrations.
According to human rights activist Arif Aajakia, like other militant organizations such as Lashkar-e-Taiba, TLP was established by the Pakistan Army to manipulate domestic politics. The Army’s involvement in activating and deactivating groups like Labbaik has been a means to maintain political dominance.
The TLP, a Barelvi Sunni group founded by Khadim Hussain Rizvi in 2015, gained prominence in 2017 after a prolonged siege of Islamabad known as the “Faizabad sit-in.” The group protested over a minor change in the parliamentary oath related to the ‘Finality of Prophethood.’ Despite being banned in April 2021 and its leader, Saad Rizvi, imprisoned under anti-terror laws, the government was compelled to lift the ban months later through a negotiated agreement led by the army.
Furthermore, the militaristic involvement in brokering deals with Labbaik has been evident in past events, such as the 2017 protests and subsequent negotiations with TLP. The group’s influence in shaping political outcomes has been significant, with instances of military officials allegedly providing rewards to TLP protesters for certain actions.
The TLP’s strategic deployment during elections and its role in influencing political dynamics in Pakistan have been highlighted by various sources. The group’s street power has often been utilized to send messages to civilian leadership about adhering to military preferences. Despite its protests and disruptive tactics, TLP is distinct from anti-state insurgent groups like Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan, operating without arms and having deep societal roots.
The exploitation of emotive issues by TLP, backed by military support, has enabled its consolidation of power and influence over time. This military-mullah nexus, exemplified by Labbaik’s ascent, poses a concerning trend as Pakistan navigates towards a fundamentalist state. The manipulation of religion for political gains has led to internal turmoil and contradictions within Pakistan, as observed by human rights activists and analysts.
In conclusion, the ongoing turmoil in Pakistan underscores the repercussions of decades of religious manipulation. The country’s trajectory towards fundamentalism and the symbiotic relationship between military and extremist elements reflect a precarious situation that demands attention and scrutiny.